Member
Mixing Grace with the Law
by Eddie Fourie
Mixing Grace with the Law is a toxic mixture far more poisonous than the Law on its own. It holds the false promise of a cure to our heart-shaped void but is unable to deliver the antidote. Paul calls it an outright perversion of the Gospel he preached (Eph 2:7) - a false religion that slowly poisons us, robbing us from the gift of God’s grace. It only leaves us burdened with guilt and shame in our attempts to please God. Such a false religion exists as much among Christians today as it did in the days of Paul. It shows itself in such rituals as reading more of the Bible, praying at least an hour a day, witnessing more for Christ, paying tithes to the church and much more in order to be a “good Christian” that God will find pleasing. On its own there is nothing wrong with those things, but when they are done to earn God's righteousness then one has entered into legalism.
Upholding the law cuts a believer off from Christ. Either Christ lives and the law is abrogated, or the law lives and Christ must perish. Christ and the law cannot live side by side. If what killed our relationship with God in the garden was eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, then the equivalent in the new covenant is mixing law and grace. The result of both is the same; it destroys our relationship with God because it attempts to know God and effect right living without God’s life itself. It wants to do that which only God can do, it wants to be free of God. The law and grace are diametric to each other, and under the new agreement of Christ we are not under the law, but under grace only.
Paul spells out in Romans that the law cannot effect right living, not because the law is not righteous in all its demands, but because the flesh weakens it. The flesh always fails miserably when it tries to keep the law, and it always will. Without God’s life, NO flesh can keep the law. Paul goes a step further to explain that where the law increases, so WILL sin. It is such a serious matter that an entire book in the New Testament devotes itself to the subject when Paul reinstructs the bewitched Galatians about a Gospel of righteousness by grace alone and not through works.
Paul was right about grace, because in the words of Martin Luther: “The Gospel (of grace) is true because it deprives men of all glory, wisdom and righteousness and turns over all honor to the Creator alone. It is safer to attribute too much glory unto God than unto man.”
Legalism is any belief of salvation where any part of it is based on anything other than the imputed righteousness of Christ. When someone introduces anything done by, or in the believer that makes him or her more saved, holier, fit for the kingdom or entitled to any part of the inheritance and reward of grace, then that person is preaching legalism. Introducing such a notion makes the rest of his message irrelevant. Such a person may say that Christ's righteousness is the only ground of salvation. He may even say that Christ's blood and righteousness is the only way that God can be just and justify the ungodly. However, if he does not make it clear that Christ's righteousness alone entitles the sinner to salvation and the entire inheritance, then he has not preached the Gospel. If he does not make it clear that all the works and efforts of sinners are excluded in this area, then he has not preached the true gospel of Paul. Usually this idea is preached when dealing with the issues of sanctification and holy living.
Mixing law and grace creates a ‘doer’ or works-righteousness based religion, and Paul underscores that we cannot do this:
“And if it is by grace, it is no longer by works, otherwise grace would no longer be grace.” Rom 11:6
What shall we say then? — that the Gentiles who did not pursue righteousness obtained it, that is, a righteousness that is by faith, but Israel even though pursuing a law of righteousness did not attain it. Why not? Because they pursued it not by faith but (as if it were possible) by works. Romans 9:30-32
Incidentally, this scripture in Romans 9 in addition with multiple scriptures in the Old Testament is Biblical proof that God entered into the old covenant law with only the Jewish people. God did not enter into the old covenant agreement of the law with the Gentiles in any form or shape. Introducing this into Christ’s salvation message is a deviation from both New Testament teaching of salvation through grace as well as Old Testament law to Israel only. It was only through Christ’s death that the Gentiles received salvation and entered into God’s salvation plan for all men (Jew, Greek, slave, freeman, male, female).
But what about the Scripture where Christ said he did not come to abolish the law, but to fulfill it? Legalism tends to focus on the first part of that statement, and conveniently ignores the second part and that scripture, and the book of Hebrews telling us the old covenant was fulfilled and became obsolete. It was part of God’s salvation plan for Christ to fulfill all the demands of the law, thus completing that old contract.
Christ was the only righteous man that walked the earth, and the only person that could fulfill all the demands of the Law. He had to fulfill the old covenant to make it obsolete so he could usher in the new covenant. The only way we come to the Father is through his Person and not by any of our works. God provided himself in Jesus to fulfill the righteous requirements of the old covenant so it might be done away with.
God’s heart's desire from the beginning was to live within, and those who lived under the old covenant only understood God from the outside. Christ flipped that world upside down and showed us that his person alone is the answer to God’s law, and that only by knowing him as our life are we able to live righteous before God. It’s a life that starts from within, working its way outward. Only Christ can live the Christian life and only God can make a man as he intended man to be. We enter into this life by faith, knowing that we no longer live, and that Christ is our life. Where the law attempts to conform us to a certain behavior, grace does the opposite of transforming us into the image of God, knowing that only God can work in us to will that which is his desire for us.
Christ gave us a far better covenant. Grace makes us free and Jesus calls us to hand over our autonomous self in unshaken confidence because we are loved by the Father right where we are at in the journey. Christianity happens when men and women accept with unwavering trust that their sins have not only been forgiven, but forgotten, washed away in the blood of the Lamb. Thus, my friend archbishop Joe Reia says, “A sad Christian is a phony Christian and a guilty Christian is no Christian at all.” - Brennan Manning
Finally, I have created a little quiz to discover how legalistic one might be. Let me immediately add this disclaimer: It’s not scientific and the questions are based on some of the discussions we have had over the last couple of months about grace and the law. It’s for informational purposes only, so please don’t sue me if you don’t like the result. Hopefully it makes you understand the gravity of not mixing grace with the law. I would be the first to admit that I have some streak of legalism in me - I think we all do to a certain extent.
An excerpt from Eddie's Blog:
by Eddie Fourie
Mixing Grace with the Law is a toxic mixture far more poisonous than the Law on its own. It holds the false promise of a cure to our heart-shaped void but is unable to deliver the antidote. Paul calls it an outright perversion of the Gospel he preached (Eph 2:7) - a false religion that slowly poisons us, robbing us from the gift of God’s grace. It only leaves us burdened with guilt and shame in our attempts to please God. Such a false religion exists as much among Christians today as it did in the days of Paul. It shows itself in such rituals as reading more of the Bible, praying at least an hour a day, witnessing more for Christ, paying tithes to the church and much more in order to be a “good Christian” that God will find pleasing. On its own there is nothing wrong with those things, but when they are done to earn God's righteousness then one has entered into legalism.
Upholding the law cuts a believer off from Christ. Either Christ lives and the law is abrogated, or the law lives and Christ must perish. Christ and the law cannot live side by side. If what killed our relationship with God in the garden was eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, then the equivalent in the new covenant is mixing law and grace. The result of both is the same; it destroys our relationship with God because it attempts to know God and effect right living without God’s life itself. It wants to do that which only God can do, it wants to be free of God. The law and grace are diametric to each other, and under the new agreement of Christ we are not under the law, but under grace only.
Paul spells out in Romans that the law cannot effect right living, not because the law is not righteous in all its demands, but because the flesh weakens it. The flesh always fails miserably when it tries to keep the law, and it always will. Without God’s life, NO flesh can keep the law. Paul goes a step further to explain that where the law increases, so WILL sin. It is such a serious matter that an entire book in the New Testament devotes itself to the subject when Paul reinstructs the bewitched Galatians about a Gospel of righteousness by grace alone and not through works.
Paul was right about grace, because in the words of Martin Luther: “The Gospel (of grace) is true because it deprives men of all glory, wisdom and righteousness and turns over all honor to the Creator alone. It is safer to attribute too much glory unto God than unto man.”
Legalism is any belief of salvation where any part of it is based on anything other than the imputed righteousness of Christ. When someone introduces anything done by, or in the believer that makes him or her more saved, holier, fit for the kingdom or entitled to any part of the inheritance and reward of grace, then that person is preaching legalism. Introducing such a notion makes the rest of his message irrelevant. Such a person may say that Christ's righteousness is the only ground of salvation. He may even say that Christ's blood and righteousness is the only way that God can be just and justify the ungodly. However, if he does not make it clear that Christ's righteousness alone entitles the sinner to salvation and the entire inheritance, then he has not preached the Gospel. If he does not make it clear that all the works and efforts of sinners are excluded in this area, then he has not preached the true gospel of Paul. Usually this idea is preached when dealing with the issues of sanctification and holy living.
Mixing law and grace creates a ‘doer’ or works-righteousness based religion, and Paul underscores that we cannot do this:
“And if it is by grace, it is no longer by works, otherwise grace would no longer be grace.” Rom 11:6
What shall we say then? — that the Gentiles who did not pursue righteousness obtained it, that is, a righteousness that is by faith, but Israel even though pursuing a law of righteousness did not attain it. Why not? Because they pursued it not by faith but (as if it were possible) by works. Romans 9:30-32
Incidentally, this scripture in Romans 9 in addition with multiple scriptures in the Old Testament is Biblical proof that God entered into the old covenant law with only the Jewish people. God did not enter into the old covenant agreement of the law with the Gentiles in any form or shape. Introducing this into Christ’s salvation message is a deviation from both New Testament teaching of salvation through grace as well as Old Testament law to Israel only. It was only through Christ’s death that the Gentiles received salvation and entered into God’s salvation plan for all men (Jew, Greek, slave, freeman, male, female).
But what about the Scripture where Christ said he did not come to abolish the law, but to fulfill it? Legalism tends to focus on the first part of that statement, and conveniently ignores the second part and that scripture, and the book of Hebrews telling us the old covenant was fulfilled and became obsolete. It was part of God’s salvation plan for Christ to fulfill all the demands of the law, thus completing that old contract.
Christ was the only righteous man that walked the earth, and the only person that could fulfill all the demands of the Law. He had to fulfill the old covenant to make it obsolete so he could usher in the new covenant. The only way we come to the Father is through his Person and not by any of our works. God provided himself in Jesus to fulfill the righteous requirements of the old covenant so it might be done away with.
God’s heart's desire from the beginning was to live within, and those who lived under the old covenant only understood God from the outside. Christ flipped that world upside down and showed us that his person alone is the answer to God’s law, and that only by knowing him as our life are we able to live righteous before God. It’s a life that starts from within, working its way outward. Only Christ can live the Christian life and only God can make a man as he intended man to be. We enter into this life by faith, knowing that we no longer live, and that Christ is our life. Where the law attempts to conform us to a certain behavior, grace does the opposite of transforming us into the image of God, knowing that only God can work in us to will that which is his desire for us.
Christ gave us a far better covenant. Grace makes us free and Jesus calls us to hand over our autonomous self in unshaken confidence because we are loved by the Father right where we are at in the journey. Christianity happens when men and women accept with unwavering trust that their sins have not only been forgiven, but forgotten, washed away in the blood of the Lamb. Thus, my friend archbishop Joe Reia says, “A sad Christian is a phony Christian and a guilty Christian is no Christian at all.” - Brennan Manning
Finally, I have created a little quiz to discover how legalistic one might be. Let me immediately add this disclaimer: It’s not scientific and the questions are based on some of the discussions we have had over the last couple of months about grace and the law. It’s for informational purposes only, so please don’t sue me if you don’t like the result. Hopefully it makes you understand the gravity of not mixing grace with the law. I would be the first to admit that I have some streak of legalism in me - I think we all do to a certain extent.
An excerpt from Eddie's Blog:
Last edited: