Member
We tend to evaluate the BGEA by their evangelistic works. What if their 'message' contains errors? What if their 'source documents' are not accepted by the Holy Ghost, as being the 'TRUTH'?
The BGEA references many 'bibles'. Are all of these 'bibles', God's Word, or are some of them based on man's vanity?
The Word of God came to us, through anointed people who were anointed Israelites (children of God). God called them 'gods'. Who are the authors of the new 'bibles' that we find today, and are used by the BGEA (and other Christian ministers)? If the authors of these new 'bibles' were not 'anointed' by God in order to create these new 'bibles', then they are based on the authors' own vanity.
This is very dangerous. These new authors, can only be 'false prophets', without God's anointment. If the authors have not experienced Numbers 12:6, then they should not have composed these new 'bibles'.
The BGEA references many 'bibles'. Are all of these 'bibles', God's Word, or are some of them based on man's vanity?
The Word of God came to us, through anointed people who were anointed Israelites (children of God). God called them 'gods'. Who are the authors of the new 'bibles' that we find today, and are used by the BGEA (and other Christian ministers)? If the authors of these new 'bibles' were not 'anointed' by God in order to create these new 'bibles', then they are based on the authors' own vanity.
This is very dangerous. These new authors, can only be 'false prophets', without God's anointment. If the authors have not experienced Numbers 12:6, then they should not have composed these new 'bibles'.