Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Charlie Kirk

Could i ask you a question, If you were in the crowd ready to stone the woman taken in adultery would you have stoned her or dropped your stones after Christs words " Let him without sin cast the first stone", and if you would have dropped your stone then, what makes you feel able to pick them up now?.

I think I have explained this four times to you now.

Please let these facts sink in. Read them slowly and meditate on them. Each one is true, you cannot isolate one. All three true at the same time.

1. God made His thoughts on sin and particular sins crystal clear with the law He gave to the Jews. God does not change Num 23:19.

2. Jesus brought a new dispensation. One planned before the foundations of the earth Eph 1:4, in case you think God changed His mind on punishment. One where God would ''delay'' His punishment as true repentance after the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross meant that God could truly change a persons heart, mind and desire for sin. Humans become Christians. Christians are new creations in Christ 2 Cor 5:17. People who cannot go on unrepentant in sin 1 John 3:9.

3. As Christians, following Jesus, we must properly understand why God hates sin and what sins upset Him so that he ordain a graphic and violent death by stoning for them.

-----------------------

So my direct answer to your question is, if I was a Jew before Jesus came, yes, I would stone an adulterer and if I was one, accept a stoning.

But since we are living after Jesus and the cross. I know that an adulterer who repents can become a shining example of God's righteous and holy character.

Take Paul as an example. He says he was the chief of sinners 1 Tim 1:15 and yet look at all He did for the Lord.
 
if I was one, accept a stoning.
i've never met anyone who would say that unless they were born again.

and no jew i know alive today would actually follow through. but yes they would lie and say it.

i have a few jewish friends and one of them i caught in a bit of a hypocrisy situation where i was talking to him about the issues in the book "200 years together", regarding the systematic games they would play with lying to the russian authorities about the number of sons they had, so they wouldn't be drafted.

and my friend quips: "yes because we are smart"

well.. that is exactly why you should fend for yourself in your own country. since you aren't part of mine!.
 
I didn't realize that adultery is now a valid condition for the death penalty.

I was using the phrase "Let him without sin cast the first stone " as pertaining to all Death penalty methods, so it could be "Let him without sin pull the trigger, flick the switch, inject the poison, turn on the Gas", whichever methods being used.
However, that condition of stoning still exists in more than one place. So, for many it is a valid consequence for such an act.
So, what do you say should be the consequences of adultery in law?

I dont think there should be a consequence of adultery in law, or if it is it would be a civil offence, a breach of contract between 2 people, but if it was made illegal, then many of us , if not all of us would be guilty of such an act, for who amongst us has not at some time looked upon another with lust in their hearts, and if we're going to make Adultery illegal, what of greed, selfishness, envy and hate, i think all of these sins will be judged by God and his judgement just and everlasting.
Now, I agree with you that it is far removed from our Lord's words of compassion, mercy, forgiveness, and a lesson that in truth only Jesus is justified in making such a decision. So, I ask you; what laws are acceptable considering the list that you provided, and what should be the consequences if any?

In general i think there needs to be laws that protect society and provide help and rehab for offenders, and a framework that promotes a more just and equitable world , we will never achieve the world i desire, only God can do this, but until he decides to bring this man made Hell we've created to an end those that follow Christ need to, "Act Justly, Love Mercy and walk humbly with him".


For if you say no death penalty, then, everything below it should also be considered to be negated from having consequences as established by the governing authority. Otherwise, where is your compassion, mercy, forgiveness, and yes justice?

In this broken world we often compromise between what Christ has ordained and what we say and do, its the nature of sin, i see Christs words of Justice, Compassion, Mercy and Justice and try to work them out in my sin ridden life, so dont look for perfection, dont even look for consistency, but i try to put myself in the position of the perpetrator and the victim, and then try to work out Christs words of "treat others as you'd want to be treated", but as much as i know anything i know the death penalty is against the teaching of Christ, the rest becomes a bit of a mess, i think perpetrators need to be detained both for others safety and their own lest they commit further crimes, especially violent crimes, but that detention should be free of punishment and concentrate on Rehab and reform, the way i see it judgement and punishment is Gods prerogative, as he alone knows all the facts and our hearts desires, this is the best i can do and i hope it encompasses Compassion, Mercy, Forgiveness and yes,.... Justice.
So, would you then be agreeable with no consequences and as Jesus said to the adulterous woman: "Go and sin no more"?

I see Christs interaction with the woman taken in Adultery as comprising 2 parts, the first is the recognition that we are ALL sinners who have no right to pass judgement on other sinners, and the second part is the forgiveness of the womans sin, now whether that judgement is just in relation to the death penalty or is applicable to all judgement, idk, but i see it as a call to Compassion, to Mercy, to banish retribution and vengeance from our hearts, and Christ forgives the woman, not the crowd wanting to stone her, for he alone can forgive sins , so i see a case, ,for violent crime especially, to detain the perpetrator but make that detention a place for reflection and transformation and hopefully re-birth, and not a place of punishment and retribution.

You asked me in a previous message, "Is there no middle ground with you", to which i replied, "My middle ground is between Christs words and how i work them out in my life", you will probably see my words here as being in that "middle ground".



With the Love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC/Moderator
Nick
\o/
<><
 
I was using the phrase "Let him without sin cast the first stone " as pertaining to all Death penalty methods, so it could be "Let him without sin pull the trigger, flick the switch, inject the poison, turn on the Gas", whichever methods being used.
Doesn't change it at all, unless you're saying; plucking out the eyes, or taking a limb off is acceptable as long as it's not the death penalty, or maybe solitary confinement until they die, or hard labor forever etc.
I dont think there should be a consequence of adultery in law, or if it is it would be a civil offence, a breach of contract between 2 people, but if it was made illegal, then many of us , if not all of us would be guilty of such an act, for who amongst us has not at some time looked upon another with lust in their hearts, and if we're going to make Adultery illegal, what of greed, selfishness, envy and hate, i think all of these sins will be judged by God and his judgement just and everlasting.
Aren't you glad that it's Jesus' righteousness that is imputed to the believer! Alleluia!
In general i think there needs to be laws that protect society and provide help and rehab for offenders, and a framework that promotes a more just and equitable world , we will never achieve the world i desire, only God can do this, but until he decides to bring this man made Hell we've created to an end those that follow Christ need to, "Act Justly, Love Mercy and walk humbly with him".
So, the death penalty is the only sin for which the consequences should be set aside, as it’s the only one where the act, for those in Christ, doesn’t reflect what you mentioned above?
In this broken world we often compromise between what Christ has ordained and what we say and do, its the nature of sin, i see Christs words of Justice, Compassion, Mercy and Justice and try to work them out in my sin ridden life, so dont look for perfection, dont even look for consistency, but i try to put myself in the position of the perpetrator and the victim, and then try to work out Christs words of "treat others as you'd want to be treated", but as much as i know anything i know the death penalty is against the teaching of Christ, the rest becomes a bit of a mess, i think perpetrators need to be detained both for others safety and their own lest they commit further crimes, especially violent crimes, but that detention should be free of punishment and concentrate on Rehab and reform, the way i see it judgement and punishment is Gods prerogative, as he alone knows all the facts and our hearts desires, this is the best i can do and i hope it encompasses Compassion, Mercy, Forgiveness and yes,.... Justice.
I see Christs interaction with the woman taken in Adultery as comprising 2 parts, the first is the recognition that we are ALL sinners who have no right to pass judgement on other sinners, and the second part is the forgiveness of the womans sin, now whether that judgement is just in relation to the death penalty or is applicable to all judgement, idk, but i see it as a call to Compassion, to Mercy, to banish retribution and vengeance from our hearts, and Christ forgives the woman, not the crowd wanting to stone her, for he alone can forgive sins , so i see a case, ,for violent crime especially, to detain the perpetrator but make that detention a place for reflection and transformation and hopefully re-birth, and not a place of punishment and retribution.

You asked me in a previous message, "Is there no middle ground with you", to which i replied, "My middle ground is between Christs words and how i work them out in my life", you will probably see my words here as being in that "middle ground".
I see in these two the position that you hold, and my heart goes out to you brother. Our desire as a believer, is always for those who do not know Jesus, is to know Him. Sadly, the world does not go along with it. Jesus becomes the last thing they would provide or allow for. There was a prison in the US in Alabama, that would provide Bibles to each inmate and encourage the reading thereof. This actually reduced the recidivism rate of those incarcerated there, but needless to say a Godless world couldn't have that, and the prison no longer is allowed to do this. :(

You can hold the very beliefs that lead your life in Christ, as you are able, but just know you won't be able to bring mercy, justice to anyone, for the very reason you stated. Only forgiveness is yours to give. Sadly, the prisons will never be what you want. They are a world unto themselves. So, far removed from the world, outside of Jesus, and the incarcerated believer, bringing Him to be part of it, there is no hope to be found in them.

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC/Moderator
Nick
\o/
<><
 
How far depends on the individual as well as the country you are talking about wouldn't you say? Actually, deterrent does work, but it depends on the socioeconomic conditions, systemic factors of the country that you are talking about when one is talking about crime. Think about nuclear weapons, and mutually shared destruction. So, deterrence does work, but it really has other factors that must be considered, before one says it doesn't work or has limited affect.

Some countries go over the top in punishment, and it seems to work. Check out Singapore. While I agree in some countries like Iceland, Denmark, have low crime rates, what you will also find is its racial homogeny is also limited. Not something anyone likes to talk about or take into account either. lol

So specifically relating to the death penalty what evidence have you got that its a deterrent, and i agree that other factors need to be taken into consideration, but have States that have abolished the death penalty witnessed a rise in violent crime?, ....... and even if they have, isnt our faith based on morality and not practicality, or do you think that just because something works then its validated?.
Exactly, right. For a Christian, but for the non-believer who are already transgressors against God, and Christ, the laws of the state stand as an acceptable form of punishment to be metered out.
But not for Christians if they go against the teachings of Christ.
The interesting part of it is, try standing on your forgiveness in Christ Jesus for your sins, in a regular court of law and see how far that gets you! I do believe that Paul saw this, and as a Roman Citizen, was able to plead his case to Cesar.


Actually, you see the very issue of "forgoing one sin so that another may be committed". You are saying that "we can only transgress the laws of a country...", even though the authority that made the laws of the country is God. You would fall back on man-made law, while the authority is God for them to do so! That's the conundrum you are facing, and why I said what I said.
I'm still a bit lost with this, my reasoning powers not as great as yours i'm afraid, my position is, Christians must obey the law of the land unless that law conflicts with Christs teachings , then we must follow Christs teaching and accept whatever consequence befalls us.
I agree with your "middle ground". Romans 7:14-20 speaks well to this.

I disagree with your explanation of "what if scenarios". For to you it may be an assist to see if the implications of one's belief can hold water, because it is a too weak version to the actual reality of having to follow through in faith one's belief. In certain instances that is fine, but in the area we are talking about I would say no. Would I rely on those scenarios if I knew I’d have to face the reality of making decisions based on them, knowing they might not truly reflect what my actions would be when the time came to make them if they were personal? Or am I just deluding myself into thinking they would? I am honest to know that I would not want to be tested in this way, for I know my own sinful nature. To do otherwise, is to seek to have your resolve tested in reality, which for me is similar to asking for patience!
I agree, we can from the position we're now in speculate "what if....."., and it might not be an indication of how we would act when faced with reality, but i still think it makes us put ourselves in a situation we're theorising about, asks us what do you hope you would do when faced with such a situation, guess we're different, for myself, it concentrates the mind, makes me go a step further that just saying, and perhaps helps to see a little deeper into the complexities of "What if.....".
That is why I provided Paul's words.


We need to pass judgment brother! In fact, we do it every day of our lives. However, doing it rightly is the conundrum we all must face. Folks like to use the adulterous woman as an example, of forgiveness of sin, but leave out the future behavior being judged not just in this act, but all acts. Forgiveness for that one act of hers does not negate first the consequences of her sin apart from the stoning, but also any future sin being brought to account against her.
We need to pass judgement on the actions of ourselves and others, but what we cant do is pass judgement and then condemn others to death, or to "righteous" punishment, for that is Gods prerogative, he alone knows all, we just see the action , the outward person, he sees inside and knows the history of us all.

Our sins will be judged by God, and God alone, and i think we will all be surprised at his judgements, for many that consider themselves first will be last, and the last first.
You asked me a question, and I know the answer lies not in anything I’ve done, but in what He, my Jesus, has done for me. So, I ask you this: Do you believe your actions are what will save you? If so, what does that mean for God’s grace?

No my actions will not save me, we are saved by Gods Grace, but my actions are an integral part of my salvation in that they show my being Born again into a follower of Christ, for without loving our neighbour as ourselves, for treating others as we'd want them to treat us, for not having Love in our hearts, then our professed faith is worthless.
:)
Do you believe salvation is individual or can be received as a community?
Salvation is individual.
Then why are you not following our laws that we have in the US, or for that matter, any of the myriad laws for caning, the cutting off limbs, etc.? Which they do to neighbors too who commit the crimes that warrant it or are you saying that if you commit a crime, you should not be punished for it, or only God can punish you, and not by the authority He put in place to do so?

First of all i live in the UK, but if the UK passed a law that contravened the teachings of Christ i hope i'd have the courage to disobey it, or are you saying every law, even those that contravene Christs teaching should be followed by a Christian?

And what i'm saying is, that if we are punished for following Christs teachings, for "Righteousness", then we should accept that punishment knowing that "Blessed are those persecuted for Righteousness sake, for the Kingdom of Heaven is yours",
I've asked you to break down which USAID funded programs are acceptable to be cut, but I hear only generalities for funding that is being cut, and not specifics. What falls under what one would consider humanitarian aid, is wide and varied, to were you to know what they were, even the most liberal of people would say "what?". So, what I am saying, is that just saying so does not make it true. Research a little of the programs that Musk's team Doge was suggesting being cut (all placed on line), and you might have a better idea of what is being talked about. Instead of believing everything from the left or right that you've gotten your information from. Also, what is the UN doing? Isn't that their responsibility?

Here's a start: I hope you don't have a problem with these or at least the majority of them.

I have no problem with waste and corruption in Overseas aid being cut out of programmes, my only worry is that who's making the decision whether a programme is "worthy" or not?, and what will happen to the Aid programmes cut, will the money from them be put back into more worthy Aid programmes?.
Program/Grant DescriptionCountry/RegionAmount (USD)Rationale for Cut (per DOGE)Status
Grant to Gavi (global vaccine access organization)Global$1.75 billion (claimed; actual prior payout $880 million)Duplicate funding and lack of oversight; seen as inefficient international handout.Canceled in full.
PEPFAR (HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment, including Ebola efforts)Africa/Global$9.4 billion (partial cut from broader USAID health programs)Accused of "woke" elements; initial freeze disrupted meds for 2M+ people, later partially restored amid backlash.Partially cut; chaos reported in supply chains.
DEI/ESG consultancy servicesAfrica$520 millionCorporate-style "woke" consulting with no direct U.S. benefit.Terminated.
Biodiversity conservation and "licit livelihoods" promotionColombia$25 millionVague environmental/social engineering abroad.Canceled.
Social/economic inclusion for sedentary migrantsGlobal$40 millionUnclear value; prioritized foreign migrants over U.S. needs.Axed.
Social and behavioral change research/programsUganda$42 millionIdeological interventions with low ROI.Cut.
Political development and election strengtheningGlobal (Consortium for Elections)$486 millionForeign election meddling; included voter turnout boosts.Eliminated.
Voter turnout enhancementIndia$21 millionNon-essential foreign political influence.Terminated.
Political landscape strengtheningBangladesh$29 millionBureaucratic waste in unstable regions.Canceled.
Fiscal federalism and biodiversity initiativesNepal$39 million ($20M + $19M)Overlapping, low-impact grants.Both cut.
Social cohesion promotionMali$14 millionRisky funding in conflict zones with fraud potential.Axed.
Inclusive democratic processesSouth Africa$2.5 millionRedundant "inclusion" efforts.Terminated.
Educational outcomes improvementAsia$47 millionBroad, untargeted spending.Cut.
Condom distributionHamas-linked groups (Gaza)$100 millionFunding to terrorist-affiliated entities.Halted.
Voluntary medical male circumcisionMozambique$10 millionQuestionable health priority abroad.Canceled.
Independent media voices strengtheningCambodia$2.3 millionMedia bias promotion.Axed.
Public procurement enhancementSerbia$14 millionAdministrative bloat.Terminated.
Political participation and inclusionMoldova$22 millionForeign political activism.Cut.
Voter confidence boostingLiberia$1.5 millionMinimal U.S. strategic value.Canceled.
Sesame Street educational programmingIraq$20 millionCultural exports with no security return.Eliminated.
Meals for al-Qaeda-linked groupSyria$10 millionDirect aid to terrorists.Halted.
Combating disinformationKazakhstan$4.5 millionCensorship tool disguised as aid.Cut.
Avoiding binary-gendered language training for journalistsSri Lanka$7.9 millionExtreme ideological training.Terminated.
LGBT advocacyJamaica$1.5 millionNon-core U.S. foreign policy.Axed.
LGBT causes/activismGuatemala (sex changes), Uganda, Western Balkans, Armenia, Honduras, South Africa, Latin America, Global$2M + $5.5M + $3.9M + $1.1M + $1.9M + $6.3M + $2M + $6M (total ~$28M)"Woke" priorities over essentials.All canceled.
Equity and inclusion educationGlobal (USAID Education)$8.3 millionDEI in foreign schools.Cut.
EcoHealth Alliance (bat virus research funding)Global (Wuhan lab ties)$5 million (x2 instances)Links to controversial origins of COVID-19.Terminated.
Gas station constructionAfghanistan$43 millionUnused infrastructure boondoggle.
Pottery classes and promotionMorocco$2 millionCultural frivolity.Canceled.
Transgender operaColombia$47,000Artistic propaganda.Axed.
Transgender comic bookPeru$32,000Niche ideological media.Terminated.
Reintegration gift bags for deportees (incl. Barbie dolls)Global$27 millionSilly, low-value items.Cut.

Controversies: While DOGE touted fraud reductions (e.g., $1B recovered), global health experts estimated 14 million+ preventable deaths by 2030 from disrupted programs like PEPFAR and malaria aid. Legal challenges temporarily blocked some cuts, but courts largely upheld DOGE's authority.

So are you happy with the cut in programmes leading to 14 million extra preventable deaths, and what if it was 1.4 million, what if 140,000, what price do you put on a life saved.
What Christians should advocate? Want me to add a verse for you to say, that we are in the World but not of it?
The way i see it we must try to extricate ourselves as much as possible from the greed, selfishness, envy, hate and lust of this broken world, but given those sins are within all of us , thats impossible to do, so we try the best we can, yep, middle ground again!!.......as for being in the world, we are called on to be "the salt of the Earth", to "Let our light shine before men that they may see our good works and glorify our father in Heaven", "Love the Lord our God with all our heart and our neighbour as ourselves".
You suffer for people, so turn them to Jesus! I knew of an organization that decided not to try to use the giving of food with the Gospel of Jesus. Do you know why? Not to upset the people who believed differently!!! These same organizations if you were to tell them, that they could have all the money they needed, but the Gospel of Jesus would have to be spread along with it...do you know what they'd say??? "NO THANK-YOU"! That is how ultraistic the organizations you are dealing with are!!! Saving their bodies seems so important to them, but losing their eternal lives doesn't matter as much!

So, what should Christian's advocate? The Gospel!!!!

Thats a part of it, but we must also advocate for Justice, Compassion, Mercy and forgiveness, and in so doing we are advocating for the Gospel, let our faith be not just in words but in actions as well, faith without deeds is a dead faith indeed, "let our light shine before men that they may see our good works and glorify our father in heaven",.........i'm a great believer in material aid and the word of God, but it has to be done with consideration for both the people you're helping and the condition they find themselves in, otherwise it could do more harm than good, and also as evidenced here on this forum, theres such a divergence of views on what constitutes being a follower of Christ, but given all those variables and imperfections, yes i agree, the word of God is a great solace in times of trial and tribulation.
People often approach me outside grocery stores asking for money to buy food. Instead of giving them cash, I offer to shop for food with them and cover the cost, but so far, no one has taken me up on it! You can’t be sure where the money actually goes. You want to believe it’s all helping the poor and hungry, but the reality is often darker than what you imagine about those who are cutting funding.

I understand that we are ALL sinners, with all that implies, the poor are just people, with all the sins inherent in us all, those that administer and receive Aid are also just people, greed, corruption and self interest run through them all like it does all of us, my position is simple, if only 10 pence in the pound got through i'd still give, for something is always better than nothing, of course i'd campaign to reform the aid delivery, cut out the corruption as much as you can, but the option to not give is not an option for a follower of Christ.
Oh, and please don't put the blame of poverty and suffering on the people who did not create the problem in the first place! (Matthew 26:11)
I am with you, but I'm also a realist, to the grey areas that have caused the problems that we see worldwide. Give them Jesus, and you will have given them what all the resources in the world could never give them and won't be able to!
Yes the poor will always be with us, and why do you think that is, why in a world where God gave sufficient resources for all to live a life where their needs were met is there such poverty and suffering. If you look around at what we have in the rich world you may find the answer.

And if you and your family were starving and someone came along and said " I could give you food , or i could give you a Bible and the word of God", which would you choose, for me , its not an either or situation, we need both spiritual and physical nourishment , its easy to theorise with a full stomach and material possessions, but take those away and the reality might be a little different
That is the focus, as a Christian, in disciple making, and all else we do is so that we can give them Jesus! If you don't include that with what you do, and hope that they'll get it some other way...well...

Agreed, and youve made me think about my priorities as to my giving, i'll look more at Christian based organisations in the future, i already include some but need to focus more on not just providing bread ,... "for man cannot live on bread alone but by every word of God."
With the Love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC/Moderator
Nick
\o/
<><
 
But not for Christians if they go against the teachings of Christ.
I'm still a bit lost with this, my reasoning powers not as great as yours i'm afraid, my position is, Christians must obey the law of the land unless that law conflicts with Christs teachings , then we must follow Christs teaching and accept whatever consequence befalls us.
If you go against the state, you're also sinning. Christ wasn’t opposed to the death penalty, but He emphasized being certain, as the judgment you use will be the standard applied to you. It’s not about revenge but about valuing the sanctity of life. That’s why I referenced Romans 13:1-4 and the state’s authority to carry it out.

No my actions will not save me, we are saved by Gods Grace, but my actions are an integral part of my salvation in that they show my being Born again into a follower of Christ, for without loving our neighbour as ourselves, for treating others as we'd want them to treat us, for not having Love in our hearts, then our professed faith is worthless.
Then I would be like Paul. If I do something worthy of death, then I would not fight against it. Which is as all Christians should be. However, the non-believer does not look at it that way.

Salvation is individual.
Yes, and Amen!

First of all i live in the UK, but if the UK passed a law that contravened the teachings of Christ i hope i'd have the courage to disobey it, or are you saying every law, even those that contravene Christs teaching should be followed by a Christian?

And what i'm saying is, that if we are punished for following Christs teachings, for "Righteousness", then we should accept that punishment knowing that "Blessed are those persecuted for Righteousness sake, for the Kingdom of Heaven is yours",
If you break the law then you are punishable, and will meet the consequences of so doing, whether you be Christian or not. As it should be.

So are you happy with the cut in programmes leading to 14 million extra preventable deaths, and what if it was 1.4 million, what if 140,000, what price do you put on a life saved.
I noticed you could not bring yourself to say you were against the ones I showed you! If you were to show me specifics as I have shown you instead of generalities, then I would agree with you, but saying something is happening doesn't mean it's happening. That is why generalities when you deal with organizations that have an iron in the fire for what happens to the funds/resources, should have very little to say, without presenting specificity to their claims on how they are being affected. The US has a site (don't recall at the moment exactly where) that will tell you how the funds that are given to non-profits are used. The existence of some organizations that receive funding but use over 90 percent for administrative costs is a travesty! Yet, they are still allowed to consider themselves non-profit! :(

The way i see it we must try to extricate ourselves as much as possible from the greed, selfishness, envy, hate and lust of this broken world, but given those sins are within all of us , thats impossible to do, so we try the best we can, yep, middle ground again!!.......as for being in the world, we are called on to be "the salt of the Earth", to "Let our light shine before men that they may see our good works and glorify our father in Heaven", "Love the Lord our God with all our heart and our neighbour as ourselves".
Yep, if I sin, then I expect to receive consequences. For my neighbor to be held accountable too, is to love them enough to do so. Thankfully, Jesus died for my sins, and that God sees His righteousness, and not mine, if I had any that were worthy to be counted that is.

I understand that we are ALL sinners, with all that implies, the poor are just people, with all the sins inherent in us all, those that administer and receive Aid are also just people, greed, corruption and self interest run through them all like it does all of us, my position is simple, if only 10 pence in the pound got through i'd still give, for something is always better than nothing, of course i'd campaign to reform the aid delivery, cut out the corruption as much as you can, but the option to not give is not an option for a follower of Christ.
Agreed, but that's not our call to make for everyone. You can only speak for yourself, and no one else.

And if you and your family were starving and someone came along and said " I could give you food , or i could give you a Bible and the word of God", which would you choose, for me , its not an either or situation, we need both spiritual and physical nourishment , its easy to theorise with a full stomach and material possessions, but take those away and the reality might be a little different
The problem is that many organizations do not allow for both. It is either or. Find one that does and leave the others to their own devices.

Agreed, and youve made me think about my priorities as to my giving, i'll look more at Christian based organisations in the future, i already include some but need to focus more on not just providing bread ,... "for man cannot live on bread alone but by every word of God."
Amen! That is why I go through my church for guidance since they have the wherewithal to point me in the right direction and have done the necessary research. I seek to give to them, that feed the body & soul!

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC/Moderator
Nick
\o/
<><
 
I said I keep updating on this so I have been led to a calvary chapel n they r in turn also related to the Britney Spears saga with her money seems the pastor wife from Calvary helped get that money from Brit n she also went after Lindsay Lohan also..they r also related to the orphan age saga that has been happening for a minute..
I'm leaning real hard to the sad conclusion is that Charlie was a sacrifice for power..



乁⁠[⁠ᓀ⁠˵⁠▾⁠˵⁠ᓂ⁠]⁠ㄏ
 
But in the "Global Village" that the world is now, we are in a position where we can help almost everyone, and if you believe that God has created the conditions where we can do this then the hungry, the homeless, the sick, the prisoner, the outcast, whoever is in need are our responsibility, they are our neighbours and in them we see the person of Christ himself, so would you turn away from your Saviour if you can help him?.
You are absolutely wrong. There is NO global village. There is people that need help all over the world, but its only the people you know of that you are more likely to determine is legitimate or not. With 90% of ppl worldwide that say they need help, they either dont really need help, or the money that gets funneled toward them goes to evil people instead. You can use wisdom to know the truth locally, but you simply dont know the situation elsewhere in the world unless you simply trust people who have never shown themselves trustworthy to you.
 
The Old Testament was clear on it, as is the New Testament on adhering to the laws of the government one lives in. If the nation allows for it, then one needs to adhere to it, since all authority is God given, and it would not be in power if not for Him. For the judgment they do is in place of God, with His authority.

The authorities are God's servants, sent for your good. But if you are doing wrong, of course you should be afraid, for they have the power to punish you. They are God's servants, sent for the very purpose of punishing those who do what is wrong. Romans 13:4 You are also welcome to read 1-5 as well.
Dear Christ4Ever,
I'm picking up on Romans 13:4 and have some grave concerns ...
We all know that we are in End Times, and I wonder whether using Romans 13:4 is still pertinent today.
We all know what the anti-Christ is up to, and has been planning for centuries.
Surely the rules (that are changing daily, and being put into place stealthily, throughout the World) that our Gvts are following are not of Our God.
Could they be of their god?
This verse is pretty unsettling, bearing in mind the Spiritual War we find ourselves fighting, alongside Our Lord.
Thoughts on how appropriate Romans 13:4 are in today's Time?
Thanks, Linda
 
You are absolutely wrong. There is NO global village. There is people that need help all over the world, but its only the people you know of that you are more likely to determine is legitimate or not. With 90% of ppl worldwide that say they need help, they either dont really need help, or the money that gets funneled toward them goes to evil people instead. You can use wisdom to know the truth locally, but you simply dont know the situation elsewhere in the world unless you simply trust people who have never shown themselves trustworthy to you.
There is a Global Village in as much as we are now more interconnected than at any time in our history, go into your store, supermarket, online store or whatever and you are more likely then not to find goods and produce made in other countries, what happens throughout the world impacts us all, the recent COVID-19 pandemic is an example of this, as is Climate change and disruptions in global trade due to Tariffs , there is now mass migration between countries and wars and tensions only too quickly escalate and become Global issues.

Yes there are people in need all over the world, and the main reason theyre in need is not because of lack of resources, theres plenty of food in the world, yet nearly 800 million people are severely malnourished. The main reason people are poor is because others are rich. The wealth and comfort of the Rich are built upon the Poverty, suffering and death of the poor. This is one of the reasons Christ condemned the rich and exalted the poor.

Some of the money thats sent to charities gets misused, thats a fact of human nature, we are all sinners, all look to ourselves first, but there are many organisations out there whose members are putting themselves in the line of fire and hardship working to alleviate the suffering in places such as Sudan, Gaza, DRC and Yemen to name a few.

Now you have a choice who to help and who not to, thats up to you, but the suffering Christ is also in those places as well and sometimes we just have to trust others, i cant be there in person but through my donations i can feed the hungry, provide clean water for the thirsty, shelter for the homeless, medical care for the sick and help for those imprisoned.
 
Dear Christ4Ever,
I'm picking up on Romans 13:4 and have some grave concerns ...
We all know that we are in End Times, and I wonder whether using Romans 13:4 is still pertinent today.
We all know what the anti-Christ is up to, and has been planning for centuries.
Surely the rules (that are changing daily, and being put into place stealthily, throughout the World) that our Gvts are following are not of Our God.
Could they be of their god?
This verse is pretty unsettling, bearing in mind the Spiritual War we find ourselves fighting, alongside Our Lord.
Thoughts on how appropriate Romans 13:4 are in today's Time?
Thanks, Linda
Dear Sister Linda,
There will always be grave concerns for the believer, when it comes to any government. There were issues with Rome during the establishment of the church, and it has pretty much been that way even to this day. However, it still does not negate what Romans 13:4 says. The authority is God given, but it doesn't mean that those who are given that authority will follow Godly principles. :(

Rare is the occurrence whereby a Christian is forced to do what is contrary to Scripture, without having an outlet to escape a government's demands upon them. Like Abortion, or the Death Penalty, and condoning same sex marriage, and the list can go on and on. You can disapprove of them, but the government cannot far as I can tell, force you to comply with them, without God providing an alternative to what it says you must do. It might be painful, and the cost great, but like our Lord said "I have told you all this so that you may have peace in me. Here on earth you will have many trials and sorrows. But take heart, because I have overcome the world."

For your observation that asks could other gods be influencing governments. Of course, but they can only do what our God allows them to do and then no more. The question of course that seems to pop into everyone's mind is why God would allow them to do this, when He was the one who gave the government the authority in the first place! Good question that one, but not one easily answered without running through the entirety of the Bible in the examples therein that are provided!

The future has in store for us is not different then the past, and in fact even greater persecution, but a finality of it all with the return of Lord Jesus! Just be as He has said of us to be "Look, I am sending you out as sheep among wolves. So be as shrewd as snakes and harmless as doves." Matthew 10:16

So, hang in sister in faith, and know that God is in control, and remember this World is not our home!

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC/Moderator
Nick
\o/
<><
 
I think I have explained this four times to you now.

Please let these facts sink in. Read them slowly and meditate on them. Each one is true, you cannot isolate one. All three true at the same time.

1. God made His thoughts on sin and particular sins crystal clear with the law He gave to the Jews. God does not change Num 23:19.

2. Jesus brought a new dispensation. One planned before the foundations of the earth Eph 1:4, in case you think God changed His mind on punishment. One where God would ''delay'' His punishment as true repentance after the sacrifice of Jesus on the cross meant that God could truly change a persons heart, mind and desire for sin. Humans become Christians. Christians are new creations in Christ 2 Cor 5:17. People who cannot go on unrepentant in sin 1 John 3:9.

3. As Christians, following Jesus, we must properly understand why God hates sin and what sins upset Him so that he ordain a graphic and violent death by stoning for them.

-----------------------

So my direct answer to your question is, if I was a Jew before Jesus came, yes, I would stone an adulterer and if I was one, accept a stoning.

But since we are living after Jesus and the cross. I know that an adulterer who repents can become a shining example of God's righteous and holy character.

Take Paul as an example. He says he was the chief of sinners 1 Tim 1:15 and yet look at all He did for the Lord.
You'll have to excuse my ignorance, i'm afraid i'm not the sharpest pencil in the box so you just might have to explain it for the fifth time, so you wouldnt pick up the stone now to stone someone to death, as long as the accused repents of their sin, but how would you know, how would you know they truly repent of their sin, and just where did Christ say "Let him without sin cast the first stone unless the accused doesnt repent of their sin",

So if a murderer, child rapist or perpetrator of a crime worthy of Capital punishment repented of their crime then you wouldn't call for their execution, but if they didnt repent then they should be executed?.

And i dont think God changed his mind on punishment, but that Christ fulfilled the law, it was planned from the very start, a plan that replaced Justice through Human judgement and punishment to Forgiveness and Mercy with God solely exercising judgement and punishment after death, a recognition that we are ALL sinners and in no position to pass judgement and punishment on others.

And its very easy to see the sins Christ hated the most, the sins of Hypocrisy, the possession of wealth, and the failure to help those in need. And its also too easy to say you'd offer your life to be stoned to death , the reality just might be somewhat different!.

You said "As Christians, following Jesus, we must properly understand why God hates sin and what sins upset Him so that he ordain a graphic and violent death by stoning for them.".......so in Exodus 35: 2 God ordains those that work on the Sabbath should be put to death, is this the sort of Sin that upsets God?, seems to me that if it was so important to him then Christ would have at least mentioned it once in the Gospels, but when accused of breaking the Sabbath Christ said "The Sabbath was made for Man and not Man for the Sabbath", but then as i say, i'm not the sharpest pencil in the box and i'm sure you'll have a plausible explanation.

So bringing it back to thread, was CK right in calling for the death penalty for child sex offenders and others convicted of Capital offences, even if they repent, was he right as a Christian to call for their public execution sponsored by Corporations such as Coca-Cola and was he right as a Christian to say it would make his day to see the execution of a convicted Child sex offender, do you think a Christian should be pleased at the taking of life, however "worthy" we deem that taking to be?.
 
but that Christ fulfilled the law,

Only for believers.

Matthew 5:17


“Do not think that I have come to abolish the Law or the Prophets; I have not come to abolish them but to fulfill them.”

  • Jesus fulfills the Law, but He doesn’t say this automatically saves everyone—He’s setting up the foundation for righteousness through Him.



Romans 3:21–22


“But now apart from the law the righteousness of God has been made known… This righteousness is given through faith in Jesus Christ to all who believe.”

  • Fulfillment leads to righteousness through faith, not universally.



Romans 10:4


“Christ is the end of the law so that there may be righteousness for everyone who believes.”

  • Key phrase: “for everyone who believes”—not all humanity.



Galatians 2:16


“…a person is not justified by the works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ…”

  • Again, justification is conditional on faith.



John 3:16–18


  • You already noted this is the strongest: salvation is offered to all, but only those who believe receive eternal life.
 
There is a Global Village in as much as we are now more interconnected than at any time in our history, go into your store, supermarket, online store or whatever and you are more likely then not to find goods and produce made in other countries, what happens throughout the world impacts us all, the recent COVID-19 pandemic is an example of this, as is Climate change and disruptions in global trade due to Tariffs , there is now mass migration between countries and wars and tensions only too quickly escalate and become Global issues.

Yes there are people in need all over the world, and the main reason theyre in need is not because of lack of resources, theres plenty of food in the world, yet nearly 800 million people are severely malnourished. The main reason people are poor is because others are rich. The wealth and comfort of the Rich are built upon the Poverty, suffering and death of the poor. This is one of the reasons Christ condemned the rich and exalted the poor.

Some of the money thats sent to charities gets misused, thats a fact of human nature, we are all sinners, all look to ourselves first, but there are many organisations out there whose members are putting themselves in the line of fire and hardship working to alleviate the suffering in places such as Sudan, Gaza, DRC and Yemen to name a few.

Now you have a choice who to help and who not to, thats up to you, but the suffering Christ is also in those places as well and sometimes we just have to trust others, i cant be there in person but through my donations i can feed the hungry, provide clean water for the thirsty, shelter for the homeless, medical care for the sick and help for those imprisoned.
But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel".

Funny how people claim to wanna help those across the seas yet they will let those of their own land go homeless and hungry..will allow the Fatherless be taken advantage of while concerned with those they can't even speak too .

Funny how them "churches" wanna collect to send missionaries but refuse help to those who go to them in need .

┐⁠(⁠´⁠(⁠エ⁠)⁠`⁠)⁠┌
 
You'll have to excuse my ignorance, i'm afraid i'm not the sharpest pencil in the box so you just might have to explain it for the fifth time, so you wouldnt pick up the stone now to stone someone to death, as long as the accused repents of their sin, but how would you know, how would you know they truly repent of their sin, and just where did Christ say "Let him without sin cast the first stone unless the accused doesnt repent of their sin",

So if a murderer, child rapist or perpetrator of a crime worthy of Capital punishment repented of their crime then you wouldn't call for their execution, but if they didnt repent then they should be executed?.

No. There were many stoned to death that did repent. It is common knowledge that an opportunity is always given. Even Muslims practice this today.

I am going to try a different angle. You and I cannot properly judge depths of hearts and minds. Only God can Jer 17:9-11. Before Jesus, 'Gods people (aka Jews at the time)' would therefore not attempt to play God. They would see a mortal sin and pass sentence. But with Jesus, the cross and the now very present Holy Spirit, things have changed. We can know that someone who becomes a Christian can truly have a changed heart and mind. Making it crystal clear that stoning any Christian guilty of a mortal sin to death, be an utter and complete waste of a life that can and will truly serve God. At the same time we can conclude that all living have an opportunity to truly repent of their sins and be made new creations in Christ. It is therefore not prudent for God to enforce the death penalty on anyone.

This is true at large, but there are three exceptions that I see in the NT.

1. Stopping the work of God

Many say Ananias and Saphira died because they lied to the Peter. Whilst that was their sin, a deeper investigation shows that by withholding their true fortune from God, they were stifling God's plans for the early church. This resulted in their instant death.

2. Betraying Jesus

Judas may have killed himself, but did God try stop him?

3. To uphold God given laws that are required to properly govern a society.

As explained very clearly by Paul in Romans 13:1–4, "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities… for he [the authority] is God’s servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. He is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God’s wrath on the wrongdoer.” and Acts 25:11 “If then I am a wrongdoer and have committed anything for which I deserve to die, I do not seek to escape death''. We see from the words of Jesus that these laws are influenced from above John 19:11 You would have no authority over me at all unless it had been given you from above.

Now, the death penalty for Charlie Kirks murder definitely falls into point 3. You don't need the death penalty for all murderers. But you do need it for a murderer that can start a chain reaction of murders and have a massive negative impact on society.

That is logical and a 'duh' judgement. Paul would rebuke Christians who could not judge matters better than the unsaved 1 Cor 6:1-9.
 
Last edited:
You said "As Christians, following Jesus, we must properly understand why God hates sin and what sins upset Him so that he ordain a graphic and violent death by stoning for them.".......so in Exodus 35: 2 God ordains those that work on the Sabbath should be put to death, is this the sort of Sin that upsets God?, seems to me that if it was so important to him then Christ would have at least mentioned it once in the Gospels, but when accused of breaking the Sabbath Christ said "The Sabbath was made for Man and not Man for the Sabbath", but then as i say, i'm not the sharpest pencil in the box and i'm sure you'll have a plausible explanation.

Why do you think God gets upset with Jews who do not respect the Sabbath?

If I was a Jew I would make sure to never dishonor it. It is a day that God isolated for remembrance and gratitude for Him helping them escape 400 years of slavery with the greatest miracles ever seen. Any Jew mocking the Sabbath is disrespecting Him at a very high level. One that He clearly refuses to tolerate.

Jesus could perform miracles on the Sabbath, because He was God. The scripture you quoted is commonly used as support for the trinity.

So bringing it back to thread, was CK right in calling for the death penalty for child sex offenders and others convicted of Capital offences, even if they repent, was he right as a Christian to call for their public execution sponsored by Corporations such as Coca-Cola and was he right as a Christian to say it would make his day to see the execution of a convicted Child sex offender, do you think a Christian should be pleased at the taking of life, however "worthy" we deem that taking to be?.

So, you are not correctly representing Charlies view. Sit back and think of the sin of a ''child sex offender''. It works up an emotion in all of us for an immediate death penalty. Do you think that if a sex offender repented of their sins and accepted Jesus as Lord, CK would call for their death? Yes or No?

Have you not seen the movie ''The sound of freedom''? I support the death penalty for all involved in this. You cannot have this in any society. There are governing laws required in a society that certainly over ride ''let him without sin cast the first stone'' that both Jesus and Paul acknowledged. As explained in my post directly above to you.
 
If you go against the state, you're also sinning. Christ wasn’t opposed to the death penalty, but He emphasized being certain, as the judgment you use will be the standard applied to you. It’s not about revenge but about valuing the sanctity of life. That’s why I referenced Romans 13:1-4 and the state’s authority to carry it out.
But not if you go against the State in following the Commandments of Christ, i saw a meme a few days ago that said " The ones that sheltered Anne Frank broke the Law, The ones that killed her followed the Law", are you saying theyre both sinning?,
Seems to me that Christ was against any form of earthly punishment, "Let him without sin cast the first stone " can be applied to all forms of State punishment, Christ said "Judge not lest you be Judged, for the judgement you give will be used against you", he also said, "Take the log out of your own eye so you can see clearly to take the speck out of your brothers", are you saying that you are without sin so can cast the stone and that you have removed the log from your eye to see clearly where to throw that stone?,
And it seems ironic that you talk of the sanctity of life while advocating for the taking of life.
Could i ask you a question Nick, Christ told a story about the Pharisee and the Publican going to pray, the Pharisee trusted in his own Righteousness, the Publican acknowledged what a wretched sinner he was and wouldnt even raise his eyes from the floor asking God for mercy for his sins, Christ said the Publican left justified while the Pharisee was condemned, where do you see yourself?.
Then I would be like Paul. If I do something worthy of death, then I would not fight against it. Which is as all Christians should be. However, the non-believer does not look at it that way.
Agreed, we should accept our punishment for transgressing the law in the cause of Righteousness, For Blessed are those persecuted for Righteousness sake, and great will be their reward in heaven
Yes, and Amen!


If you break the law then you are punishable, and will meet the consequences of so doing, whether you be Christian or not. As it should be.


I noticed you could not bring yourself to say you were against the ones I showed you! If you were to show me specifics as I have shown you instead of generalities, then I would agree with you, but saying something is happening doesn't mean it's happening. That is why generalities when you deal with organizations that have an iron in the fire for what happens to the funds/resources, should have very little to say, without presenting specificity to their claims on how they are being affected. The US has a site (don't recall at the moment exactly where) that will tell you how the funds that are given to non-profits are used. The existence of some organizations that receive funding but use over 90 percent for administrative costs is a travesty! Yet, they are still allowed to consider themselves non-profit! :(
If the programmes you showed were indeed corrupt then i have no problem in them being terminated. But was the money saved given to more worthy programmes?, and what were the qualifications of those making that decision?, and here in the UK Charities are required to publish their accounts and are subject to Charity Commission rules. One of the first things i do when considering giving to an organisation is check out the amount spent on Admin and fundraising and the amount that goes to Aid programmes, Corruption and waste pervade every Human Institution, its just the way we are but every effort should be made to ensure as much money as possible goes to those in need..
Yep, if I sin, then I expect to receive consequences. For my neighbor to be held accountable too, is to love them enough to do so. Thankfully, Jesus died for my sins, and that God sees His righteousness, and not mine, if I had any that were worthy to be counted that is.
I think the major difference between us is that while we both accept that sin has consequences, you argue for those consequences to be administered on Earth by other sinners while i think that God alone is the Arbiter of our sins and that judgement and Punishment are for him to decide
Agreed, but that's not our call to make for everyone. You can only speak for yourself, and no one else.
Christ said "Deny yourself, take up your Cross and follow me", he told of our salvation or otherwise being dependent on our actions for those in need and he said to trust in God to provide, to give all we had to the poor and we would have treasure in Heaven. Seems to me there is no option for a follower of Christ but to give, of their time, of their possessions and of their lives in the service of Love,......thats what i should do, the reality is somewhat different, but i try to do more, but knowing all the time just how feeble my efforts are.
The problem is that many organizations do not allow for both. It is either or. Find one that does and leave the others to their own devices.


Amen! That is why I go through my church for guidance since they have the wherewithal to point me in the right direction and have done the necessary research. I seek to give to them, that feed the body & soul!

With the Love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC/Moderator
Nick
\o/
<><
 
Doesn't change it at all, unless you're saying; plucking out the eyes, or taking a limb off is acceptable as long as it's not the death penalty, or maybe solitary confinement until they die, or hard labor forever etc.
I believe that ALL forms of Earthly punishment are included in Christs words "Let him without sin cast the first stone", i see that phrase as a metaphor saying that none of us are in a position to punish others,.
Aren't you glad that it's Jesus' righteousness that is imputed to the believer! Alleluia!

So, the death penalty is the only sin for which the consequences should be set aside, as it’s the only one where the act, for those in Christ, doesn’t reflect what you mentioned above?
The consequence of our sins are not set aside , for we shall ALL have to answer to God for what we do on this Earth, but we cannot pass judgement on and punish other sinners as we are sinners ourselves, in some cases far more culpable of sin than the sinner we rush to condemn. Only God can see all, only God knows the state of our hearts, only God knows all the facts and only God can pass Righteous judgement.

I see in these two the position that you hold, and my heart goes out to you brother. Our desire as a believer, is always for those who do not know Jesus, is to know Him. Sadly, the world does not go along with it. Jesus becomes the last thing they would provide or allow for. There was a prison in the US in Alabama, that would provide Bibles to each inmate and encourage the reading thereof. This actually reduced the recidivism rate of those incarcerated there, but needless to say a Godless world couldn't have that, and the prison no longer is allowed to do this. :(
The word of God can bring hope where there was none, can give purpose and meaning to a life where where before there was only self gratification and selfishness, can bring Light into the darkness of the coldest heart.

You can hold the very beliefs that lead your life in Christ, as you are able, but just know you won't be able to bring mercy, justice to anyone, for the very reason you stated. Only forgiveness is yours to give. Sadly, the prisons will never be what you want. They are a world unto themselves. So, far removed from the world, outside of Jesus, and the incarcerated believer, bringing Him to be part of it, there is no hope to be found in them.
I can act Justly, love mercy and walk with Humility, the rest is up to God, but never say there is no hope, for with God, everything is possible, you said yourself that when the Bible was given to inmates in prison it had a profound effect on their nature and Christ himself can be found within their walls, " I was a prisoner and you visited me not", i have read many accounts of death row prisoners who have seemingly undergone a miraculous transformation during their time awaiting execution, becoming model prisoners, helping others, many claim to have turned to God and fellow prisoners, prison authorities and even the relatives of those murdered have called for clemency which is often sadly lacking, would you take away that chance of redemption, that chance of forgiveness, i certainly wouldnt and i dont think Christ would either. it seems to me that come the day of Judgement many that thought of themselves as Righteous and true will be condemned and those who we call sinners and outcasts will be exalted, "For many that are first shall be last and the last first".


With the Love of Christ Jesus.
YBIC/Moderator
Nick
\o/
<><
 
But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel".
The question is what does it mean to provide, how much do we need ourselves before we decide to help others, and i say need, not want, when there are 1 billion men, women and children living in abject poverty on less than a couple of $ a day, when around 15,000 children die every day from malnutrition and disease, when the Christ we profess to follow says that we should "Deny ourselves, take up our cross and follow him" and that in the face of the hungry, the homeless, the sick, the thir5sty and imprisoned we see him, then how much will it take to sayisfy our "providing" before we deem to help him?.
Funny how people claim to wanna help those across the seas yet they will let those of their own land go homeless and hungry..will allow the Fatherless be taken advantage of while concerned with those they can't even speak too
In this world of vast resources it shouldnt be a question of "us or them", we are ALL Gods children and we ALL deserve to be treated with Love and compassion no matter where we are born, there are enough resources to provide everyone with a decent life its only through the greed and selfishness of those who want to "provide" more than their fair share that Hunger, Poverty, suffering and Death consume so many.
.

Funny how them "churches" wanna collect to send missionaries but refuse help to those who go to them in need
Well if thats the case then the Love of God is surely not within them, God has provided enough for all, its only our sin that makes this world the Hell that it is for so many.

Could i ask you a question, you accused me of "spreading lies about Charlie Kirk", i'd be interested to know what i said to make you believe this?.

And you also accused me of "Not wanting to do the leg work" in finding out about CK, i think you misunderstand the nature of a discussion board, i make a statement, you say why you agree or why you dont agree with what ive said and we "discuss" until we come to an understanding of the others position, thats what makes this discussion board so important, for it brings people of differing views together who can talk, hopefully without rancour, and get to understand differing views of what it means to be a Follower of Christ.
.

┐⁠(⁠´⁠(⁠エ⁠)⁠`⁠)⁠┌
 
The question is what does it mean to provide, how much do we need ourselves before we decide to help others, and i say need, not want, when there are 1 billion men, women and children living in abject poverty on less than a couple of $ a day, when around 15,000 children die every day from malnutrition and disease, when the Christ we profess to follow says that we should "Deny ourselves, take up our cross and follow him" and that in the face of the hungry, the homeless, the sick, the thir5sty and imprisoned we see him, then how much will it take to sayisfy our "providing" before we deem to help him?.

In this world of vast resources it shouldnt be a question of "us or them", we are ALL Gods children and we ALL deserve to be treated with Love and compassion no matter where we are born, there are enough resources to provide everyone with a decent life its only through the greed and selfishness of those who want to "provide" more than their fair share that Hunger, Poverty, suffering and Death consume so many.

Well if thats the case then the Love of God is surely not within them, God has provided enough for all, its only our sin that makes this world the Hell that it is for so many.

Could i ask you a question, you accused me of "spreading lies about Charlie Kirk", i'd be interested to know what i said to make you believe this?.

And you also accused me of "Not wanting to do the leg work" in finding out about CK, i think you misunderstand the nature of a discussion board, i make a statement, you say why you agree or why you dont agree with what ive said and we "discuss" until we come to an understanding of the others position, thats what makes this discussion board so important, for it brings people of differing views together who can talk, hopefully without rancour, and get to understand differing views of what it means to be a Follower of Christ.
The Truth is just the Truth what is to discuss..? If the Truth is right or wrong?..
Remember what I wrote to you about long post with me??how I get lost with mans words?..
The Truth is very simple He is very easy to understand He is not like man who don't say what He don't mean..
I was brought up N. Philadelphia.. I watched what happened there with my own eyes . I seen what man is capable of the great evils.. I've seen "church" after "church" all denominations exchange hands from leader to leader I watch them scramble to get that cash to claim to send missionaries to other countries while the children in their neighborhood at they age of five are on street corners yelling boomba to signal the drug and gun dealers that the police are coming..I've seen the dead lye on the ground uncovered for hrs upon hrs shot up because the police n fire and ambulance people don't want to deal with the hood... I've had little children that were neighbors that were raped tortured n left for dead at the ages of three and up..

There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death

There's only one Truth man likes to force his will fact is tho the Truth will never bend to the will of man..

Like it written those that help others yet don't help their own are worse then an infindel..


Hope all's well..
(⁠o⁠´⁠・⁠_⁠・⁠)⁠っ
 
Last edited:
Back
Top