Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to Talk Jesus Christian Forums

    Celebrating 20 Years!

    A bible based, Jesus Christ centered community.

    Register Log In

Why I Don't Celebrate Christmas

Jesus could not have been born on December 25th


Many preachers today do not believe that Jesus was born on December 25th, and for obvious biblical reasons, such as what we have been mentioning concerning the course of Abijah, Elizabeth conceiving during that time, and then hiding for 5 months, and in the sixth month of Elizabeth's birth, Mary conceiving, thus giving birth 9 months later.

There were 2 times of the year, within their main (non-feast) priestly duties via courses for the division of Abijah, and they were held in June/July and later in December/January.

And if you calculate both, none of them bring you to December.

Say June 15 is when Elizabeth conceived, well 15 months later, which is when Mary gives birth, it would bring you roughly to September 15th, give or take.

But say December 15th is when Elizabeth conceived, well 15 months later, which is when Mary gives birth, it would bring you roughly to March 15th, give or take.

Many bear witness to the earlier time June/July, for many reasons, and there are other reasons that people give towards that that I have not mentioned.

And it just fits, even via how many important biblical events tend to happen on feast days.
 
Right now, I am looking at history via what is called Christmas, even Epiphany, and comparing history with history, via many articles, even through the Encyclopedia Britannica, my dad gave me, via the 1960 edition.

I will first place it in a word document, and some things said, do not add up with the whole, but I will seek to be as accurate as possible.

Is the narrative that first comes in most searches, the truth ? Not always.
 
Yes, there was a real person called Nicholas, but the stories fabricated around him are wrong, and are fables, so we should not give heed to fables.
He was a Bishop of Myra so Catholic. Catholics are heavily rooted in tradition so are all sects of Christianity to some level.
Helping the poor, sick, and children is a CORE part of Christianity regardless of sect. From that, inference about him doing that happened. Inflated? Possibly. Totally fabricated? No.

Currently no know writings by him or other evidence to support them but doesn't mean they don't exist.
In fact, what he did was so good and great he inspired Santa Clause. The Christmas season is flooded with Christian values towards each other and to reverence our Lord.
Most certainly NOT anything to do with Left/Liberal beliefs.
 
He was a Bishop of Myra so Catholic. Catholics are heavily rooted in tradition so are all sects of Christianity to some level.
Helping the poor, sick, and children is a CORE part of Christianity regardless of sect. From that, inference about him doing that happened. Inflated? Possibly. Totally fabricated? No.

Currently no know writings by him or other evidence to support them but doesn't mean they don't exist.
In fact, what he did was so good and great he inspired Santa Clause. The Christmas season is flooded with Christian values towards each other and to reverence our Lord.
Most certainly NOT anything to do with Left/Liberal beliefs.
Helping the poor, the sick, and all that in and of itself, is right, but the fable they made up of him, were some man rides in a slay with flying reindeers, and has godly attributes, is a lie no matter how much people want to deny this, we have to be honest, instead of defending fables.
 
Helping the poor, the sick, and all that in and of itself, is right, but the fable they made up of him, were some man rides in a slay with flying reindeers, and has godly attributes, is a lie no matter how much people want to deny this, we have to be honest, instead of defending fables.
That bishop of Myra was not a fable, but Santa Claus is.
 
The early church

The best source for truth is the bible.

And some of the great witnesses of the early New testament church, were the Apostle Paul, Peter, John, and so forth.

But when Paul was getting closer to the end of his life, he said this:

Act 20:29-31
(29) For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock.
(30) Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them.
(31) Therefore watch, and remember, that by the space of three years I ceased not to warn every one night and day with tears.

And in truth, that is exactly what happened, when he got off the scene, it may be that at the beginning it was gradual, but it eventually led to an apostasy within that, or near that era.

So let us look at things of that nature.

And we do not have to go far, we just have to look at the 7 churches of Revelation, which that book, is said to have been written around A.D. 95 or 96, in the time of the emperor Domitian.

Some of the warnings were these:

1. Rev 2:4 “...thou hast left thy first love…”
2. Rev 2:14 “...because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication….” , Rev 2:15 “...So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans…”
3. Rev 2:20 “...I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols….”
4. Rev 3:1 “...I know thy works, that thou hast a name that thou livest, and art dead….”
5. Rev 3:16 “So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.” , Rev 3:17 “Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing;…”

These were some of the problems that many of the churches were dealing with, in the time of A.D. 95 or 96.

It was not minor problems but big problems.

Now I know this is not on the issue of Christmas, but I am showing things one bit at a time, so people know what happened in the early church, and in my next post of this nature, I will define more some of these problems, and then we can look at the church of the A.D. 100s, A.D. 200’s.
 
7 churches problems (part 1)

Now of the Seven churches, ones that had a great testimony were the Smyrna church (persecuted church), and the church of Philadelphia (church of brotherly love).

Now in the Thayer Greek definitions, the definitions it gives, concerning Smyrna is the word “myrrh”, and concerning Philadelphia is “brotherly love”.

Now concerning the churches which had problems, here are the words defined by the Thayer Greek dictionary, concerning them.

The church of Ephesus’s defining word is “permitted”, and the church of Pergamos is “height or elevation”, the church of Thyatira is “odour of affliction”, the church of Sardis is ”red ones”, and Laodicea is “justice of the people”.

That is what the Thayer definitions say, though concerning the Laodicea church (which I call “the lukewarm church”), how the word Laodicea came to mean justice “of” the people, I am not sure, but many times, in certain cases, churches took on a resemblance of what the meaning of the places were, and even within some of the things that took place in those places, it seemed to have some influence, in some way, and even in some cases, God may have used things within their culture, so to describe their problems which I will cover one of them, in part 2 of the 7 churches problems, when I mention the Laodicea church.

And in this particular post, we will just cover 2 of the churches with problems.

So now, let us look at the problems.

Spoken to the Ephesus church

-Problem 1: Rev 2:4 “...thou hast left thy first love

Now the Ephesus church did have some things that was worthy, in how they hated the deeds of the Nicolaitans, and have tried some that said they were apostles, and found them to be liars, and they had patience in some manner, and for his name’s sake laboured, but even in doing all of this, they had left their first love.

And in order to get back to this first love, they had to repent, and get back to the first works.

Well what was their first love? Well it was when they first became born again, and were in love with Jesus, they had to get back to that.

But how? By doing the first works, what first works ?

Well what was the first work that started in us at salvation ? It was sanctification, it was taking up our cross daily and following him, and they were going away from that, and the motivation of their work was no more being done through the care and love of God, but rather just simply going through the motions, forgetting about one’s sanctification, which actually brings us away from love, and going unto just say disputing for the sake of disputing, and going through the motions without the care of God.

And at the end of each mention of these problems, I just want to remind people of what the defining word for each church is, which for Ephesus, it is “permitted”.


Spoken to the church of Pergamos

-Problem 2: Rev 2:14 “...because thou hast there them that hold the doctrine of Balaam, who taught Balac to cast a stumblingblock before the children of Israel, to eat things sacrificed unto idols, and to commit fornication.” , Rev 2:15 “...So hast thou also them that hold the doctrine of the Nicolaitans

Now the things that God was not pleased with, were that they held to the doctrine of Balaam, and the doctrine of the Nicolaitans.

Here is a comment on the issue of Balac casting a stumblingblock before the children of Israel:

(Balaam's Stumblingblock Strategy)

(..Balaam had been hired by King Balak to curse Israel, but God intervened at every turn. Instead of curses flowing from Balaam’s lips, blessings poured forth. Balak’s fury grew with each failed attempt, but Balaam had learned something crucial: if you cannot destroy God’s people through supernatural means, perhaps you can undermine them through natural appetites.

The Strategy of Immediate Gratification

Balaam’s advice to Balak was diabolically simple: use food and fornication….

...The effectiveness of Balaam’s strategy becomes painfully clear when we turn to Nehemiah 13. Even centuries later, the consequences of these compromises still plagued God’s people. What began as seemingly small concessions - sharing meals with pagans, intermarrying with unbelievers - had grown into systemic spiritual decay. )


Now the word fornication is used in many ways in the bible, it is used to point to sex before marriage, but also it refers to sexual perversion, even via a sexual appetite for someone else other than your wife, also there is spiritual fornication, and these things tend to lead to other things.

Now as concerns eating meats sacrificed to idols, the bible gives advice on this, it says that first of all you should refrain from this, but for the conscience sake of a weak brother in the faith, and not to bring confusion via your witness, were people think you think it is ok to sacrifice meats to idols.

Rather than walking in pride, we should walk in the love of Jesus, and just obey him, walking in his love in every way, even towards a weak brother.

And by all means refrain from fornication, so it seems that some type of loose living was in the mix.

And then there is the doctrine of the Nicolaitans, which may have had some mixture of loose living within it, but it seems that there was some distinction between the doctrine of Balaam, and the doctrine of the Nicolaitans.

The word Nicolaitans may have been a mix of someone‘s name and it’s main doctrine.

And the word Nicolaitans means “laity conquerors.” And it is said by this preacher that they are preachers who exploit the people instead of spiritually developing them.

And there is plenty of evidence of this clergy over the laity stuff happening in the early church, as we will later see.

And the defining word for Pergamos, is “height or elevation”.


So those were these churches problems, we will cover the next three, in my next post.
 
7 churches problems (part 2)

Now here are the other problems of the seven churches:

Spoken to the church of Thyatira

-Problem 3: Rev 2:20 “...I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess, to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols.”

Concerning this issue, I will just quote this:

(The Seven churches of Revelation, by Christophe Hanauer, page 53)

(Although Jezebel was probably not her real name, she was someone who bore great resemblance to the Jezebel of the Old Testament (see 1 Kings 16 and following). Jezebel from the Old Testament became known in tradition as the ultimate personification of evil. Not only did she bring pagan worship into Israel including all of its immorality, she also did not hesitate to kill the prophets of God, and officially set up Baal worship through her bloody reign of terror.

The Jezebel in Thyatira was combinig pagan and Christian influences in the church by encouraging Christian involvement in the debauchery of pagan festivals. This is why we find her depicted as a prostitute in this letter….)


No doubt the Thyatira Jezebel was likened unto the Old testament Jezebel, which there was influence via eating meats sacrificed to idols, and physical fornication but also she caused people to commit spiritual fornication, via the influence of celebrations towards other gods, as the Jezebel of the Old testament did, which spiritual fornication goes along with these verses:

Rev 2:21-22
(21) And I gave her space to repent of her fornication; and she repented not.
(22) Behold, I will cast her into a bed, and them that commit adultery with her into great tribulation, except they repent of their deeds.

And the defining word for the church of Thyatira is “odour of affliction”.



Spoken to the church of Sardis

-Problem 4: Rev 3:1 “...I know thy works, that thou hast a name that thou livest, and art dead….


Now concerning the defining word for Sardis being “red ones” some say that it may have been called Sardis after the sardius stones, which is red, beautiful and a precious stone.

And concerning our problem, via the church of Sardis, here is a comment on that:

(The Seven churches of Revelation, by Christophe Hanauer, pages 60-61)

(…In the literature of the time, Sardis epitomized debauchery and lasciviousness. The church in Sardis hid behind the veneer of religious tradition, but was living a materialistic, dissolute lifestyle.

The church had concentrated on religious ritual rather than a relationship with God.…

...But Jesus confronts the church and exposes them for what they really are: spiritually dead….)


Concerning this church, it says that it hath a name, that it livest, and art dead.

So it seemed to have made a name for itself, in some way.

And here is a comment from John Wesley on this:

(John Wesley)

(...Thou hast a name that thou livest - A fair reputation, a goodly outside appearance. But that Spirit seeth through all things, and every empty appearance vanishes before him.)



They were not what they thought they were, in reality they were spiritually dead, they had the religious masks, and religious traditions, which they had gone away from a relationship with God, and had to repent.

And in some ways this makes me think of the sardius stone, on the outside it looks beautiful, but inwardly the many of the church of Sardis, sure did not look like a sardius stone, or like a red one perse, but it was ugly inside.


Now the defining word for the church of Sardis is “red ones”.



Spoken to the church of Laodicea

-Problem 5: Rev 3:16 “So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.” , Rev 3:17 “Because thou sayest, I am rich, and increased with goods, and have need of nothing;…

In our modern times, this makes me think of the prosperity gospel, although it is not restrictive to that, many fall into the love of money, even without directly preaching the prosperity gospel, even pastors of various denominations such as some Baptists, some Methodists, some Pentecostals etc.

And in saying this, it looks like there was some type of prosperity gospel at that time.

Now here are a few comments on the Laodicea church:

(Topical Bible: Lukewarmness: Laodicea)

(..The metaphor of lukewarmness is particularly poignant given Laodicea's geographical context. The city was situated near Hierapolis, known for its hot springs, and Colossae, known for its cold, refreshing waters. The lukewarm water of Laodicea, neither hot nor cold, serves as a fitting illustration of the church's spiritual state—neither fervent in faith nor refreshingly alive.…)


(The Seven churches of Revelation, by Christophe Hanauer, page 77)

(...The Laodiceans prided themselves on being rich and not needing anything. In fact, even after the earthquake that had devastated the town, Laodicea was able to refuse Rome’s offer for financial assistance-they were so wealthy, they did not need it.

They were very proud of their success. Archeologists have found the incription “by our own might” engraved several times in Greek on the buildings reconstructed after the earthquake. Blinded by their wealth and self-sufficiency, they took pleasure in all different forms of entertainment, but John’s letter exposed their true inner condition.)


They needed to repent, they were in love with money, and had a lukewarm lifestyle, trying to mix the world with the ways of God, which cannot be mixed.

And we can see that in Laodicea they literally had lukewarm water which God used as a metaphor for their spiritual condition, and in Laodicea’s defining word, it says justice of the people , and not for the people, it makes me think of entitlement, and the saying “by our own might” seems interesting.

I am not saying that the defining words of each church has to fit, but interestingly enough, there sure have closely fitting descriptions, via the condition of each church.

And the defining word for Laodicea, is “justice of the people”.


So these are the rest of the 7 churches problems, and did it spread to the A.D 100’s- A.D. 200’s ???
 
Back
Top