Professor Rhiannon Graybill, who specializes in “queer biblical interpretation,” is a key figure in a growing movement to reshape Scripture to the homosexual agenda. In her course, Queer Bible, students are taught to explore topics like “queer pleasure in the Bible.;” They are also encouraged to question long-established biblical teachings on sexuality and gender.
Professor Graybill distorts scripture and twists stories until they fit her sexually perverted interpretation. In one example, Graybill discusses the story where the prophet Elisha revives a boy by laying on his dead body. She suggests that the text could be read as a sexualized encounter between Elisha and the child, turning Elisha into a pedophile and making pedophilia biblically approved.
Unfortunately, this isn’t isolated to one college. Wellesley College offers its own version of a “Queer Bible” course, where students are encouraged to explore biblical stories through the lens of queer theory. Meanwhile, the University of Central Florida has started “Queer Christian Fellowship” groups, for the purpose of facilitating “discussion groups around the topic ‘Queer Interpretation of Scripture.’”
Catholic Universities Toss Tradition for LGBTQ+ Ideology
The Catholic University of Portland is also shifting its focus away from traditional biblical teachings. In alignment with recent statements made by the Pope, the school has begun to emphasize inclusion and the acceptance of LGBTQ+ ideology.
Students can now swap an introductory Bible course for a new option: Queer Theologies. This course obliterates biblical teachings on marriage, sexuality, and gender. According to the course description, students are encouraged to use queer theologies to reinterpret scripture, affirm same-sex relationships, and challenge traditional Christian teachings.
Other courses include God Our Mother and Intercultural Feminist Theology, both of which replace the truth of scripture with LGBTQ+ agenda.
Twisted Scripture Fits LGBTQ+ Agenda
America was once a nation grounded in biblical truth. For generations, the KJV Bible provided the moral and ethical foundation. But thanks to the endless “versions” of scripture and translations which call God’s words into question, the once unshakable standard of truth is now subject to the shifting whims of society.
When the Bible is stripped of its authority and made subject to personal or cultural interpretation, the door is opened to manipulation. A Bible you can’t trust is a Bible that can be twisted to say anything and justify any agenda. This is exactly what’s happening with the rise of queer theology. “Professors” are twisting Scripture to agree with their perverted values, regardless of its true meaning.
God’s Word is Unchanging
Queer theology is a direct attack on the authority of the Bible, but the Word of God is clear and unchanging. God created man and woman, and ordained marriage to be between one man and one woman. Anything outside of this divine institution is sin. The King James bible is steadfast on this truth. We at Chick Publications will continue to promote the truth of scripture and the infallible Word of God as preserved in the King James Bible.
Source: Battle Cry July/Aug 2025
Christ4Ever, going back to your OP, I agree completely that a “Queer Bible” course is blasphemous and I see no way that a person professing to be Christian could be truly regenerate could teach such things. But I wish to comment on a couple of the statements made in this OP, which I understand you quoted from another source.
“For generations, the KJV Bible provided the moral and ethical foundation”. I believe strongly that God for centuries blessed the KJV as THE translation for the English-speaking world. The ERV and ASV continue that faithfulness to God’s message. Once the NCC published the RSV, I do not trust any modern translation, conservative or literal, to the degree I will trust the KJV. In the past you and I have had discussion about the
modern topic of “homosexuality”, and in a Christian spirit disagreed on it. For a person studying M-M relationships because of family or intimate church circumstances, I believe they are better off to trust the KJV while using the 1828 Webster’s English Dictionary with it.
The second statement I wish to comment on is: “God created man and woman, and ordained marriage to be between one man and one woman. Anything outside this divine institution is sin.”
Regarding this second statement:
1st, not all M-M relationships desire the legal entanglements of marriage and prefer a faithful promise with personal protections by legal documents.
2nd, not all M-M relationships are of the “gay” kind, or the LGBTQ perversions.
3rd, the conclusion drawn in the statement is a
theological construction that cannot be supported by the following two statements:
“
To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them.” (Isa 8:20, KJV)
“And these things, brethren, I have in a figure transferred to myself and to Apollos for your sakes; that ye might
learn in us not to think of men above that which is written, that no one of you be puffed up for one against another.” (1Cor 4:6, KJV)
or as revised in the ASV
“Now these things, brethren, I have in a figure transferred to myself and Apollos for your sakes; that in us ye might
learn not to go beyond the things which are written; that no one of you be puffed up for the one against the other.” (1Cor 4:6, ASV)
For Christians who study the modern hot-button issues of homosexuality and abortion, if a revision of the KJV is sought, go no more modern than the ERV or ASV. The Young’s Literal Translation is also safe on these topics. Even though I also use and study with modern translations such as the NEB, REB, NRSV & NRSVue, I reject their translations of 1 Cor. 6:9 and 1 Tim. 1:10 in particular.
Christ4Ever, I wish to close by remarking, I do not recall ever seeing any post or reply of yours written in a way inconsistent with Christian fellowship with love.