I Corinthians 3:17 If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are. ( KJV )
I Corinthians 3:17 If any man destroys the temple of God, God will destroy him, for the temple of God is holy, and that is what you are. ( For those who prefer the more accurate NASB )
condone:
1. to disregard or overlook ( something illegal, objectionable, or the like )
2. to give tacit approval to:
By his silence, he seemed to condone their behavior.
3. to pardon or forgive ( an offense ); excuse.
4. to cause the condonation of.
5.
Law. to forgive or act so as to imply forgiveness of ( a violation of the marriage vow. )
Genesis 9:6 Whoso sheddeth man's blood, by man shall his blood be shed: for in the image of God made he man.
No, I don't think ANYONE has actually said that if a person commits suicide they will go to Heaven. What HAS been said is that if a "saved" person commits suicide they WILL go to Heaven. I don't feel like quoting all the previous posts, if you need proof go back into the thread yourself and read what HAS been said. There is no question about what has been said in this thread. There's no possible way to have misinterpreted what has been said.
Now, as for encouraging and condoning and "advising" the act of suicide: IF someone who is depressed AND "saved" comes in here and sees where people have said, "No, you will not go to Hell if you kill yourself as long as you are "saved"" would this type of comment DISCOURAGE an already depressed "saved" person from making the decision to take their own life? If killing yourself, as long as you're "saved", won't send you to Hell, there is only one other option, right? Heaven? Heaven IS the greatest thing that any of us could possibly image, right? Thus the word 'Heaven'. Pain-free? Sorrow-free? Right? HOW is what some of you have said NOT encouraging the act?
I can think of a few other things that are staggering beyond belief ....
I'm pretty sure that the
Bible is CLEAR that one has to repent to get saved to begin with. Therefore, sorta dependent on it, right?
I read and re-read my posts before I ever even post them; correcting punctuation and misspellings, making sure that I've said what I have wanted to say, worded things the best way that I can, and your "reiteration" has not changed my feelings about what I've said in the slightest.
Telling a "potential" thief that he would be forgiven if he did steal something WOULD very much encourage them to commit the crime, being as there is no consequences for his actions! Really? You don't see things this way?
And you go ahead and ignore my posts in the future because I would prefer to talk with people that make at least a little bit of sense anyway. People that CAN be reasoned with. If you believe that telling a "potential" thief that he would definitely get away with stealing something is not in some way encouraging him to do the crime, yes, PLEASE ignore my future posts, by all means.
It's your opinion that I have born false witness, Isaac001. I disagree.
"Advising" isn't really the word I used, is it? If you are going to call me out on something, you should at least be fair about it. I've used the words "condone" and "encourage", why didn't you use one of those words to form your sentence?
I assume this to be a question to me? Doesn't the
Bible pretty much tell us what sin is? Shouldn't ALL Christians know what sin is? I don't think that we have to be equal with God, or think that we are equal with God, to claim to know what sin is. Sorry, maybe I don't understand what is being said here.
Do you then believe that the fruits of the Spirit are something that Christians only experience on occasion? The fruits of the Spirit come and go? If not, how can depression and joy coexist in the same person? And you're right, if something doesn't make sense according to my logic filter, I deem it not true. Until it does make sense. Don't we all judge things by our own sense of reasoning? Even if you decide that you want to completely-blindly put your faith in something that you don't fully understand, you only do it because somewhere in your mind it makes sense to do so.
And here again, we all judge whether or not we believe if someone is truly saved when we speak to them about the Lord, and listen to what they have to say. If you didn't judge them then what they say doesn't really matter and you really have no reason at all to agree or disagree with what they say. And yet, here we all are, discussing what the
Bible says and don't say, what is truth and what is not. When you disagree with someone about their views on the
Bible, you are by default saying that they are wrong in what they believe, no matter how you choose to do it. And many times it directly involves salvation. If you believe that salvation is by faith alone, then you generally also believe that people ( like me ) who believe that we play a part in our salvation are not saved because we are not trusting in the finished work of the cross and are trying to save ourselves, etc ... which is what a person HAS to believe in order to be saved according to the "faith alone" group. Just because you don't come out and say it all the time, doesn't mean that you are not judging another person's salvation. We have to judge whether or not we believe that a person might be saved in order to make the decision to listen to things that they say. If we believe that they couldn't be saved, we disregard what they say because they can't help us. Who would go to a church every time the doors open to listen to a preacher whom they didn't believe was saved? You have to judge their salvation to decide whether or not to agree with the things they say. If a person doesn't believe that belief in the Trinity is important for salvation, there is no real point in disagreeing with someone about the Trinity.
I've had people tell me that I was their brother in Christ and that it didn't matter that we disagree on OSAS, or some other topic, then turn right around and post in another thread that what I believe in is the Devil's doctrine. It's the nice "Christian" way to behave on a Christian Website, right? I figure, at least, I'm honest about disagreeing with someone. The same people like to point out at times that we're not supposed to judge another person's salvation? If what I believe in is the Devil's doctrine, shouldn't one also easily be able to draw the conclusion that there is also no way that I could be saved? I feel like I'm being honest, but am always being told that it isn't the proper way to behave on a Christian Website. It's puzzling.
Maybe I completely misunderstood what you meant by your statement?
Are condoning, yes.
You have things that you believe in too, and I'm sure that you think that what you believe is better. Otherwise, why believe it over something else? And as for leaving people in their miserable state of unbelief: Absolutely. Some people will not be deterred. Ever notice that Jesus didn't go around begging the Pharisees and Sadducees to listen to him? That he didn't go door to door, to their homes? I am starting to really realize why he didn't now. They had what they wanted.
Perhaps I should have said unbelievers, you know, people who haven't already bought into a belief.
So, I take it that you DO NOT put as much faith into some verses as you do others? Perhaps you should consider that?