Quote:
Originally Posted by Meagen
I dont know much about the King James version. I wont read anything but the NASB and then I also require it be a KEY WORD Bible. So that I can truely understand what it means in its ORIGINAL context. I mean these Bibles are amazing. They have a Hebrew/Chaldee and Greek Dictionary. Also it has Lexical aids to the new testiment.
But my point there was. When you pick and choose verses to prove or disprove something .. it has to REMAIN in context otherwise you can make the Bible say anything. I mean the Bible clearly states you cannot loose your salvation and yet the Assembly of God church claims they can tell you versus that say otherwise. And there are at least two problems with that. 1) that makes the Bible contradict itself. 2) the verse they use for salvation is out of Revalations. hello anyone that gets a salvation verse from Revaltions has to be taking it out of text. I mean sure a person can get saved by reading out of Revalations. And a person could be saved off one verse if its Gods will, but it's not likely to come out of Revalations.
|
Well although I am not an advocate of Arminianism, I am not an advocate of Calvinism either. I'm not an advocate of Protestantism or any other religious paradigm or doctrine for that matter.